CITY JOURNALISM REVIEW |
CONTRIBUTORS' BLOGS Alma Jazbec |
||
Is food killing us or are we just not controlling ourselves?November 20 2007 If we believe every report and so-called research that comes up in the news, we would be hiding in bunkers, eating roots and turn into foodophobics, waiting for the human race to die out any time. And who could blame us? The truth is that we are constantly overwhelmed by conflicting if not alarming reports of all kinds that manage to sneak into the news. Last week it was the sausage’s turn to take a beating and poor banger-lovers to be thrown into utter confusion and mad exasperation when the media revealed that its consumption was linked to cancer. As the Daily Mail put it “the great war on bacon” had started, becoming the next target, or victim, of what can only be called a preposterous food police. Taking the time to look at the small print will however uncover the most astonishing, if not revolting fact that they are mainly new findings based on percentages and relative risk which are then turned into flashy headlines meant to grab the public’s attention. The trouble with this is that we are soon faced with a plethora of conflicting evidence and left utterly confused as to who or what to listen to in the end. What would make more sense would be for the media to wait for long-term research that could then be published to encourage or warn us, instead of grabbing every new health or food-related report and turning it into the next big controversy likely to be refuted in the next issue. Then again, it would probably mean that the media would no longer fall pray to easy-lazy sensationalism ready to grab any piece of study barely out of the lab to fill the news headlines.By Sarah Nowakowska BACK TO ARCHIVE |
|||